Knight Ridder Election 2004
krwashington
 Around the World
 Correspondents
 Special Reports
 Washington

 Back to your local site:
 



  Related links

InstaPundit.com: Smart, lively commentary from mostly right-leaning bloggers.

Talking Points Memo: Joshua Micah Marshall's take from left of center.

Blogs for Bush: The other side's take on all the action in the Democratic primary.





Welcome to Red State/Blue State, a feature presented by The Anniston Star of Anniston, Ala., and The Philadelphia Inquirer.

In the December 2001 edition of the Atlantic, David Brooks wrote an essay titled "One Nation, Slightly Divisible," in which he suggested that America is divided largely into two political cultures, one "red" and one "blue." His idea is based on those electoral maps in 2000 that colored majority-Republican states in red and majority-Democratic states in blue. Brooks' witty essay pictures the red-state voter as trending rural, a salt-of-the-earth type, concerned with individual liberty and family values, whereas the "blue" voter trends urban, more of a book-reader, a Beltway-savvy intellectual, the environmentally conscious soccer mom or dad.

Cliches? Maybe. But Brooks does have his finger on two very strong currents in the American votership. It's not that Pennsylvania is a "blue state" or Alabama is a "red state." It's that our two political cultures don't talk to each other much, or even know much about each other. To bridge that gap, we've brought together two "red" voters - John Franklin and Cynthia Sneed - and two "blue" voters, Terri Falbo and Timothy Horner. Each week, they'll ponder and debate the issues arising in the election campaign. The hope is that they'll model an intelligent discussion, a great big conference room where red and blue sit down together.

Monday, September 27, 2004

Cynthia Sneed, Red Stater 

Question Number Nine: What should George W. Bush in his concluding remarks at the presidential debates?


America cannot misunderestimate the degree to which freedom-loving Americans threaten terrorists everywhere. America stands for freedom, and we have a God-given responsibility to spread freedom to all nations suffering under oppression from evildoers and tyrants.

We have been attacked by bad people who want us to get out of Iraq, leaving it in the hands of terrorists who would attack all freedom-loving people if they could.

Remember: You know what I stand for even if you don’t know what I mean.

I will spend every day protecting the American people as well as I can from further terrorist attacks. We have enjoyed significant success so far defending against this threat, and I want to continue our plan to make Americans safe from terror and America unsafe for terrorists.

Here is my pledge to the American people.

The time is over for America to do nothing while terrorists plot and execute missions that kill thousands of civilians.

Terrorists hide their faces when they execute people because they do not want to die, yet they think nothing of slaughtering little children. My opponent believes that I am a fear-monger, yet terrorists murdered little children, many of them infants, in a Russian school three weeks ago.

We are fighting barbarians. The danger is real, the threat is immediate, and the consequences are certain death. We must be vigilant, we must be decisive, we must be strong, and we must be clear about our objective: to eliminate terrorist threats against our nation at home and abroad.

We are fighting a war we did not ask for, a war we did not start, but one we will finish. We will show terrorists and those who harbor terrorists that the price they will pay for attacking the United States is much higher than they are willing to pay.

I will do my best to ensure that never again will innocent Americans make those last phonecalls to their loved ones and or jump to their deaths from the 104th floor of a burning building because planes were used as bombs.

I will do my best to keep the fight on the terrorists' soil, and not in our streets. I promise do my best to protect the American people and their children.


Blue-Stater Tim Horner writes this rebuttal:


Stay the course! It is working! We are succeeding! Democracy is coming to Iraq! No regrets! Nothing to change, and nothing to improve! For a country that demands excellence in everything we do, we seem to be pretty happy with the tiniest little baby-steps toward democracy and a whole lot of chaos.

But is this really the best we can do? Are we really safer now that there are more terrorists in the world? I don't care who the president is: When Americans are dying every day, I want our leadership to do something to stop it. And if it is not stopping, I want our leaders to swallow their egos and innovate. Is this too much to ask? But all we hear is: Stay the course! Stay with me! Any change will embolden the terrorists! Just hold still and let it keep coming! It won't last forever.

What kind of leader is this? Well, apparently, the one most attractive almost half the country right now. It appears that the worse it gets in Iraq, the more people are listening and nodding when Bush says we are winning. Were it not for the loss of human life, it would be comic. The hotter the chaos, the easier it is to listen to the cool, soothing words of our President. He looks so calm and in control.

Given the choice - and we do have a choice - many prefer our big, strong W over the death toll in Iraq. Bush tells us: "Just look at me, not over there. Everything is fine over here. Don't be so negative!"

Kerry wants to tell the truth about the dire situation facing our troops in Iraq. And he is talking about change. Real change. It's much easier to look at Bush. He is so comforting. He says everything is fine and that we are getting better every day and everything will be all right. Don't you worry. Daddy wouldn't let anything happen to you. Just close your eyes and sleep tight.

Well, I'm wide awake.


Blue-Stater Terri Falbo writes this rebuttal:

Mr. Franklin has the President assert that Homeland Security is making America a safer place. This is just not true.

Extensive research and evidence shows that no real resources are being put into Homeland Security to make us safe (see "Red Alert," by Matthew Brzezinski, Sept.-Oct. 2004 Mother Jones). The office of Homeland Security is a shoestring operation that has trouble recruiting and retaining personnel precisely because it is not viewed as serious:

1. Computers are not secure and can't receive classified data;
2. Funds have not been allocated to equip all airplanes for screening
baggage for explosives (though this could be done for what we spend in only
10 days in Iraq!);
3. Chemical sites are not secure (due to lobbying by the petrochemical industry);
4. First responders are not being given equipment or training necessary to
promote safety.

To me, the evidence demonstrates that President Bush and his colleagues are not concerned about keeping the majority of Americans safe.

Ms. Sneed has the President saying we will finish the war on terror - something he has wavered on (shall we say "flip-flopped"?). She says she believes we will make the terrorists pay a higher price than they are willing to pay. What would this be, since many have been more than willing to pay with their lives?

Closing statements by both red-staters seem to be based on a naïve, cartoon-like view of the United States in relation to the rest of the world. It is a nice fantasy to believe that our country has gone all around the world doing good and that there are just these evil barbarians out there. So all we have to do is fight the evil people over there and we will be nice and safe here at home. Unfortunately, the real world is not this neat, little fairy tale.

To conduct a serious fight against terrorism, we must have a more serious analysis - and use a little logic. As long as we allow foreign policy to be influenced by the needs of U.S. corporations for super-profits, the policy will work against freedom and democracy (since most free people want things like control over resources and decent pay and working conditions - which cut into super-profits). How can we then expect that people will not turn against us? And how can we expect that at least a percentage of those who do so would not decide they are willing to die if necessary to express their opposition?

We need policies that will isolate terrorists rather than create broader potential support for them. And we need more resources put into a real Homeland Security program to make our airplanes, ports, chemical sites, and public places safer.




  Archives

   •  08/01/2004 - 08/08/2004
   •  08/08/2004 - 08/15/2004
   •  08/15/2004 - 08/22/2004
   •  08/22/2004 - 08/29/2004
   •  08/29/2004 - 09/05/2004
   •  09/05/2004 - 09/12/2004
   •  09/12/2004 - 09/19/2004
   •  09/19/2004 - 09/26/2004
   •  09/26/2004 - 10/03/2004
   •  10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004
   •  10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004
   •  10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004
   •  10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004
   •  11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004


Bloggers from
Blue State (Pa.)


Terri Falbo

Born and raised in Southwestern Pennsylvania, Terri Falbo is a union organizer who has lived in Philadelphia for almost 30 years. She graduated from Temple University and previously worked as a construction worker for 17 years.

Tim Horner

Tim Horner grew up in Iowa, but has lived out significant chunks of his adult life in Chicago, IL and Oxford, England. He is married and has four children (14, 12, 10 and 7). Having grown up as an Evangelical in the Midwest and still a practicing Christian, he is concerned with how religion and politics mix. Because of a combination of circumstance and apathy, he has never voted in a presidential election. He currently teaches Humanities at Villanova University.
Bloggers from
Red State (Ala.)


Joe Franklin

Alabama native Joe Franklin, 58, was born in Pike County and grew up on a farm in Crenshaw County. He graduated from Troy State University in 1967. After working for 28 years with the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles as a parole and probation officer, retired to Crenshaw County, which is just south of Montgomery, where he spends his days working on the farm.


Cynthia Sneed

Gadsden resident and local college professor Cynthia Smith Sneed has a doctorate in Accounting from the University of Alabama. Her fields of academic research are in state pension and employee benefit issues. She has been published in numerous academic accounting journals and has done research for the Alabama Policy Institute. She is a member of the American Accounting Association, Governmental Finance Officers Association as well as being active in the Republican Party.



About Realcities Network | About Knight Ridder | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement

Copyright 2004 Knight Ridder. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any
of the contents of this service without the express written consent of Knight Ridder is expressly prohibited.